I chose to file my question under Working Caregiver. For the record:
I am all for social distancing.
I am all for people wearing masks in public.
I am all for COVID positive people not being admitted into nursing homes.
I am all for limiting the number of visitors at hospitals and nursing homes.
I am all for telemedicine.
I am all for the Subway being closed overnight for cleaning.
I am all for hand washing.
I am all for ZOOM meetings and telecommuting.
I am all for distance learning.
I am all for plexiglass shields protecting cashiers at the grocery store.
I am all for limiting the number of people who can be inside any store at once.
I am all for temperature checks.
I am all for contact tracing.
I am all for people working in a clean environment at least 6 feet apart.
I am all for keeping restrictions on people most at risk of having a severe case of or dying from COVID.
I am all for PPE for all health care workers having direct contact with patients.
I am all for travelers being put in 14 day quarantine.
I am all for new and stricter regulations to keep all workers regardless of industry safe!
However, a vaccine will not happen quickly and given that fact, what I am increasingly struggling to cope with and feeling angry about is this lockdown-fits-all approach to managing this pandemic. Los Angeles just announced lockdown through August. How many cities will follow suit?
This pandemic has shown that our health care system is horribly broken, and we can never go back to putting profits ahead of people. The PPE shortage is a national disgrace! But endless lockdowns or sporadic lockdowns are not the longterm solution to the design flaws of American health care.
My husband and I are spending our savings to weather this crisis. We pay our modest monthly condo charges because our building still needs to run. But all around us, neighbors' lives and livelihoods are being destroyed and some have stopped paying their rent or condo charges. Remember that unemployment doesn't cover many millions of workers.
We've endured many weeks of lockdown and what do we have to show for it? More lockdown and speeding up conveyor belts at slaughterhouses!
What we need is creative ways of getting businesses back open and people back to work safely. When is the retraining going to start of workers who can't go back to their old jobs? When is the reorganization of physical plants going to start so that people can go back to work and do so safely?
I applaud the salon lady in Texas and Elon Musk in Fremont for defying lockdown orders! People on this forum talk about how important work is for working caregivers and not just because of the money. Thankfully, I'm still working but hubby works on commission and zero sales means zero money.
I don't know why we stick around here anymore; we haven't seen my FIL in months!!! I am homesick and struggling with whether or not all this misery is worth it.
The first week in June, our county health service was able to bring to the people a drive-thru testing site. There were so many cars, that cars were being turned away hours before the testing ended. The county is trying to schedule another test. That is how desperate people are for testing.... [sigh].
In that same video, Trump CLARIFIES that:
"anyone who NEEDS a test can get a test.' He actually repeats the phrase using the word NEEDS several times.
So, why did you leave that out? Just to make him look bad?
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=mcafee&p=when+did+trump+say+anyone+who+wants+a+test#id=52&vid=a9a2e0265004b6ba6e0f2e02c927be8f&action=click
The American Conservative is one of those publications that thinks that things were just great on the 1950s. When women stayed home.
It reminds of the Mental Health Act of 1963. That shut down the me tal institutions ( which were terrible places). These were supposed to be replaced by Community Mental Health clinics (those ever got funded). Which is why you have schizophrenics living on the streets not taking their meds. And sometimes hearing voices telling them to do terrible things.
Your society gets what it PAYS for.
I'm very cranky today. In case you can't tell.
I have his asylum admission papers. He had been declared insane, signed off by a Judicial Officer. Reading through the paperwork, my great-great-grandfather was quiet and orderly. He tried to work at the hospital but the scars on his hands made it difficult. I bet if he lived in today's world, he would have had physical and occupational therapy, and would have lived in Assisted Living.
I just couldn't imagine what he witnessed living in an asylum. Glad such places were finally closed.
Here we go again. Punt it back to the families, which usually means a daughter (or sometime daughter-in-law) shoulders the burden. "Helping families provide in-home care"? That almost always means too little help.
It takes research and maybe a move to find a good facility.
I know from personal experience that you can find one that has good reviews and is clean, offers loads of activities and yet they are just warehouses for seniors, no actual care and it is all minimal everything from food to therapies to medication distribution.
So finding the best facility takes someone that cares about the senior and is willing to truly advocate for them.
Why do they resist moving into care centers? How is someone so terribly socially isolated if they have staff that dispenses meds, delivers meals, even if at a distance?
Those studies that are cited were done on seniors LIVING IN THEIR OWN HOMES.
I haven't checked, but I'd be curious to see if the funding for those studies came from the AL industry. Might be instructive.
- there is still a generation that believes NHs are horrible places (and the ones of the past definitely were)
- fear of losing control, fear of change, fear of the unknown
- cognitive decline that affects their ability to make rational decisions
- feeling overwhelmed at the thought of deconstructing their current situation
- cultural traditions/values
- denial
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/continued-isolation-will-kill-more-elderly/
One sentence I found particularly powerful: "...Endless isolation is inhumane and deadly. It is a method of torture. A punishment inflicted upon the most depraved. It dehumanizes and is the essence of monstrosity..."
I hope anyone who reads the article will comment here.
But no, instead of risking the virus infection with a 90% chance of recovery (for the 85 y.o and up), we mentally torture our vulnerable elderly until they go mad and die.
Speaking of haircuts, barbershops and salons have suffered dramatically, and while I agree that many businesses were already "sick" before the pandemic, most barbershops and salons do a brisk business and have a loyal clientele. People in this line of work including owners are not filthy rich. They are hardworking people, and this shutdown is going to set them back so much that most may never regain what they lost. It's heartbreaking.
Fun times all around. I wish I could post the sunset tonight. Gorgeous. i just wish everyone could just step outside and notice a beautiful piece of nature, and take all it in for what it's worth. I thought the sunset was beautful from my spot, but my friend took it outside her home. No filter, just pure beauty.
"Stocks Climb as Optimism Builds
The Dow Jones Industrial Average surged on optimism that economic activity is gathering steam and authorities may offer more stimulus to bolster the recovery..."
I realize untold numbers of people have suffered profound financial losses. In 38 years of business my husband (and business partner) and I have weathered recessions, 911, the mortgage crisis and now this. All the businesses that have recently gone under were already "sick" before the lockdown. It just hastened things. I am personally very confident of a recovery and there will be new, different opportunities to be had.
I will let you know what the test results are when we get them. And yes, it was an amazing trip. Flew to Rome and spent several days there, boarded an NCL ship which stopped at the Middle Eastern ports. Then flew from Abu Dhabi to Amsterdam and had a lovely 8 hour layover. Couldn't visit my niece who lives there because a colleague has just returned from a skiing vacation in the Italian Alps and hugged everyone upon return. Automatic quarantine for the colleagues and him.
A couple traveling on a cruise ship in January and had to be quarantined when the ship was quarantined in Japan. The wife never got it.
Even though exposed, and near to people with the virus.
In my opinion NYC got hit so hard and fast by CV because it is a major international business and travel hub. More infected people entered NYC and then came into contact with hundreds of people before we really knew how contagious CV would be. The great Metro system probably contributed to making the spread worse. NYC and NYS are not the only major cities or states who had pandemic plans but had not maintained the stockpiles of supplies their own plans required. Before CV hit, those "missing" stockpiles were not considered a "big deal" by either media or residents. With 20-20 rear view vision, now this is a major failure by all current office holders as society starts playing the blame game. Have our political leaders made bad mistakes handling CV? Yes, they have. But they have also made a lot of good decisions and spending a lot of time on the blame game while we are still under fire seems foolish to me. Acknowledge the mistake, learn from it, and move forward. I can not believe Cuono sent CV positive residents back to LTC because he wanted to kill off elders or even didn't care. I believe he somehow didn't appreciate the impact of his directive would be at the time. He was apparently focused on defending the hospitals, made a mistake and thousands died because of it. We all have to live with the results and maybe we can learn something for the next pandemic. Maybe feeling "burned" by not recognizing the CV risk earlier is one of the reasons Cuono is delaying reopening because he is just so fearful of getting it wrong again.
I also believe as soon as our President was briefed on the possible casualties from CV, he followed every recommendation and did everything in his power to save lives. Everyone was all over Trump for his early travel bands, yet other world leaders followed his example days and weeks later. Without those travel bans, what happened in NYC could have been repeated in every major city with an international airport. Trump and the federal agencies, including the CDC and NIH, have also made mistakes but overall they have accomplished the most important part of the mission. No one in an American hospital has been denied a ventilator because one was not available.
As bad as things are right now, it could have been so much worse and I am thankful for all the things that went right and all the first line workers who made it happen. The media keeps banging on all the things that went wrong and invites us to be angry and depressed, to demonize the leaders who have made obvious mistakes. I chose to focus on all the things that went right and be peaceful and optimistic. I may be very wrong, but at least my days will be brighter until my "wrongness" is proven.
DH and I got NYC antibody testing yesterday. We haven't been ill but were in Italy, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Oman, UAE and Amsterdam during February and early March. Everyplace we left exploded with COVID right after we left; it seems as though we have probably been exposed. Will know in a few days.
And you don't have to read the thread if you feel it's political.
Progress has its costs and benefits.
And if anyone wants to challenge the death toll in NYC, please show up here and take a look. I understand that the middle of the country is not as affected. We are.
I sincerely hope that opening up parts of the country works out. It will be a great engine to restart the economy. My kids (20s and 30 year olds) are suffering.
Just trying not to kill imumo-compromised grandpa and 91 yo great grandma.
You don't have to read a thread, so you don't have to be offended by what someone else needs to vent to keep their sanity on their caregiving journey. Others have valid opinions regardless of what you think.
If one goes back into history we will find....
W. T. Grant and Woolworth were the downfall of many a small Mom & Pop business.
Sears, Montgomery Ward, and JC Penney were the downfall of W.T. Grant and Woolworth.
Walmart, Sams Club, BJ's, K-Mart, Caldor were the downfall of many a grocery store and smaller stores.
Then comes Amazon which was the downfall of Sears, J C Penney, K-Mart, Toys R Us, HH Gregg, Linens 'n Things, Sports Authority, Borders Books, Gymboree, Dress Barn, Payless shoes, The Gap, Lord & Taylor, and many others.... [sigh]
The C-19 virus is nudging closing of stores/restaurants a bit quicker.
Yes, FF. The C-19 virus is nudging the deaths of sick old elderly a bit quicker, too.
We’re seeing family again. Zero regrets. Saw my in-laws on Mother’s Day, and again on Sunday for my nephews birthday. Zero regrets. Life is too short. Tomorrow isn’t promised. We are all luckily to be young & healthy so there is no reason for us to stop living. Staying at home isn’t living. In a few weeks the kids & I will go up to my parents house across state lines. My parents are high risk and they stayed home for the first 2 months and now they are over it. Life must go on and with their health problems, they could each go at any time so it makes absolutely no sense for them to live in isolation and not see their daughter and grandchildren. Both have survived health crisis this year that many do not survive. So....life is going on for us and it’s what’s best for US.
And of course the media.....making a big deal people dared to go outside over Memorial Day weekend. It’s been 80 degrees the last 3 days. Lots of people headed to the coast with their masks on and enjoyed the beautiful weather. And it’s all over the local news. It’s pitiful. They are evening saying it was all TOURISTS! HAHAHAHA! Lies lies lies! They want us to think that this horrible tourist invasion is going to lead to a massive surge in positive cases and we will be forced to SIP even longer. Hahahahaha jokes on them because the governor and the county are moving forward to phase 3!
You must remember the last "recovery" (worst recovery in US History) was guided by an anti-business, anti-ownership, anti-worker, pro-regulation mind set. The slow recovery was not a fundamental weakness in our economy, but rather the "drain" or burden government regulations extracted. That's why the economy took off so fast when Trump started rolling back the extra federal burdens.
Your viewpoint is also driven by your expensive state government. NYS is far richer than TN; however, NYS is not as financially sound. Because the NYS revenue stream is driven by income taxes, the state government is much larger (500-1500%) per cap than states without income taxes and any employment hit immediately causes revenue reductions. NYS was already in revenue trouble because it has been shedding high wage earners to lower taxation states; now the sudden lost of revenue as spending continued and even increased has created a big problem. NYS is looking for increasing revenue and not cutting costs much yet. TN has a balanced state budget, no state income tax, no state debt for operational expenditures, and a cash on hand contingency fund for rainy days. The first thing TN state government did when CV hit was shutdown visitation to all LTC facilities. The second was the state legislature authorized the governor to shut down all discretionary spending/projects and move money and people into departments impacted by CV. The third was to get the schools closed and hospitals shutting down elective procedures. So far TN projects we can survive CV revenue impacts by delaying some state projects and using 10-25% of the contingency fund since our revenue is mainly sales tax based and people spending unemployment checks are still paying some sales tax. The state unemployment fund has enough money thru Dec at the current record pay out level. The state continues to have problems/delays processing unemployment claims that require hands on review; the automatically processed claims go through in 2-3 days.
NYS residents and business owners are also experiencing more state interference in "restarting" the economy. TN businesses are open with social distancing guidelines for everything except large entertainment venues and those can open Jun 1 while our daily testing numbers go up and our confirmed cases and deaths go down. In my area, the local small businesses are surviving better than the national chains, a lot of people are working 32 hours instead of 40+ but most people are working some or drawing unemployment. Every restaurant now has carry out (even ones who didn't pre-CV) and a lot of people are now accustomed to carry out. Our Healthcare systems (who had to furlough people when elective procedures were shut down) are bringing employees back and plan to be at full capacity by June 30. While some businesses are down several others are hiring additional employees (delivery is big and will mostly likely remain high demand as families prefer their seniors avoid crowds). The state parks have opened but announced none of the pools in the parks will be opening this summer, so we are expecting a higher number of drownings as people with swim or wade in streams, rivers, and lakes. Only one of our local cities is opening an outdoor pool, but several indoor pools will open Jun 1. Our food banks were hit hard during late March and early April, but have returned to near normal need levels as the unemployment checks got going. When NYS allows more businesses to restart, I believe you will see your local economies spring back faster than you can believe right now. Traffic on our streets was dead a month ago; today it's 80-90% of normal. NYS is risking getting more businesses across the tipping point where they will not be able to reopen by trying to micro-manage everything. There are hard times and difficult choices ahead in both our states, but we can make it through to better days!
40 million Americans are now unemployed. Most of their jobs are not coming back anytime soon or at all. Many are making more money on unemployment than they were working.
The problems seem insurmountable, especially because each of the 50 states is going to take a different approach to economic recovery. It's going to be a mess. At this point, I don't even know where to start to build an economic recovery. Perhaps more people need to become freelancers. Others will need to go to a trade school and learn hard skills. The next wave of unemployment is going to hit middle managers. I hope they've been saving for a rainy day because it's hurricane season.
This is the greatest tragedy to befall America since the Great Depression. And I don't believe that after so many decades of having the rich getting richer and poor getting poor that Americans are as resilient as those who came out of the Great Depression.
There has to be a middle way. Resuming life, but taking precautions like distancing, masks, et al.
At this point it’s time to stop the shaming. If you are afraid of the virus, it’s ok to continue to stay home in isolation.
if you are high risk, it’s ok to stay home in isolation. likewise, it’s ok to venture out and get a taste of this “new normal”.
If your city/county has been under SIP orders for the last 2 months and you are OVER IT and ready to start living with the virus instead of in fear of it, that’s ok!
This virus isn’t going anyway. We are YEARS away from having a vaccine & seeing the results of it. This “stay home” lifestyle isn’t sustainable and there are many things we can do safely like play golf, hike or go to the beach.
There is really no reason for the young & the healthy to stop living. I’ll say it again—I am not staying home and putting my life on hold so people who have lived twice as long as me, can stay alive a few more years. Selfish are the folks demanding we all stay home while they simultaneously are able to stay home because they’ve passed on the risk to essential workers! Selfish are the people demanding we all stay home, while their income and livelihood hasn’t been affected. 35+ million unemployed all over a virus with a 98% survival rate. People MUST get back to work.
Suicides are up 300%. Would be nice if the media sensationalized the hell out of that instead of “crowded beaches”.
As for the beach, I live near the beach and I go to the beach often. Even on the busiest day at the beach on a normal year, and there were tons of people at the beach, there is so much open space that no one was ever, ever elbow to elbow with another unless they were in the same group.
I just came back from the beach a few hours ago, lots of people, and everyone respect and keep distance, way more than 6 feet. You can NOT tell accurate distances from looking at pictures or videos.
You have a HIGHER risk of getting the virus at your local market check out line than walking at the beach.
At the check out line, you're 6 feet away, at the beach, you are usually at least 10-20 feet or more away from the next person. Also, at the market, things you touch and put down were mostly likely been touched by others before you, then others will touch those same items after you. Nothing like that happens at the beach.
Let's compare the number of people per CUBIC feet, inside the market vs. open space at the beach, there is NO comparison since the sky is the limit vs. the ceiling at the market.
How about the recycled air inside the market vs. the clean open sea air? Again, no comparison.
At the beach:
--you get constant salty sea breezes that clean the air you breath.
--the dry hot sand kills bacteria and viruses in minutes
--the extremely salty water also kills bacteria and viruses
--the UV rays of the sun will also kill bacteria and viruses
So what I can see and observe, the chance of getting the virus at the beach is practically zero.
I am both heartbroken and also angry. Angry because his death could have been prevented if he would have listened to the medical experts about precautions.... so sad.
My boss was at the golf course for his tee time when he felt so tired he couldn't get out of his car. Then it went down hill from there :(
Did anyone see the world news this evening? OMG, there was film of people all crammed together in a water park.... another of crowded beaches. Is life so throw away that one would risk becoming ill or catching the virus to pass onto others, just to go the the beach or water park?
And all this goes on while some people still refuse to wear masks, yet the management to my knowledge hasn't acted on it, despite signs on the doors. The staff shouldn't be responsible for removing the non-maskers, especially given the hostility some of them show when challenged.
On Friday I saw at least a dozen people not masking, including one couple who I thought were classic high risks. Both were morbidly obese, slovenly, and cutting through aisles as they pleased.
I was thinking that eventually stores may have entrance monitoring, with some type of digital or photographic methods of highlighting noncompliers and barring their way, something like the subway turnstiles.
This all seems so dystopian, yet it may be necessary if people fail to comply.
Another thing I'd like to see implemented would unfortunately be a breach of medical ethics, but it's that anyone who admits to not wearing a mask in public be triaged for lower level attention. Why should noncompliers benefit from the same level of priority as compliers?
Why should anyone be required to wear a mask to enter a public space? Recently our government was resisting people wearing face coverings on religious grounds because it interfered with identification. Even in the early CV shutdowns, mask wearing was discouraged for the general public. What legal basis would you deny care to someone who chooses to act differently than _you_ believe they should? The CDC has changed the recommendations and/or guidelines on wearing masks and the reasoning behind those guidelines so often to make any reasonable person's head spin.
Current thinking/guidelines is to wear a mask in public places WHERE SOCIAL DISTANCING CANNOT BE MAINTAINED to contain the respiratory spread _from_ an infected person, not to protect the non-infected from breathing respiratory droplets so much (because small particles get in most masks). That may be changing again since one recent study shows infection from droplets left on common use surfaces isn't as infectious as previously believed. And the increasing number of people who have recovered do not need to wear a mask at all. The CDC guidance also states people doing heavy exercise or with breathing problems should avoid wearing a mask. COPD suffers or people who asthma flairs may pass out as oxygen level falls from even limited mask wearing. Or maybe that couple you saw have lung or heart issues making long term mask wearing _immediately_ life threatening, instead of a low to moderate risk or catching CV _potentially_ life threatening. Shouldn't they be able to make the decision for themselves without any "mask shaming"?
What business wants to "enforce" ever changing _guidelines_ on their customers?
As far as reducing treatment for people who do not follow _your_ choices, would it be acceptable to deny or reduce treatment for people carrying the DNA strands identified for breast or ovarian cancer? After all, they could escape needing expensive treatments in their 40s and 50s by having much cheaper "preventive" hysterectomies and mastectomies in their 20s and 30s.
How about restrictions on people who have carrier genes for cancer, sickle cell, cystic fibrous, tay-sacks, diabetes, osteogenesis imperfecta, etc. having children? If these people were not _allowed_ to have children, all the known genetic based illnesses would be removed in one generation. Think of all the money we could save on both treatments and cure/treatments research. And all that needless suffering by children growing up with these disorders! All we need to do is sterilize the carriers and/or abort any carrier fetuses.
Concerned people who suspect they have genetic problems would avoid testing? Easily solved, just use the blood samples required for decades from newborns for genetic testing too.
Although I understand the thinking of current European medical and socialital influences supporting aborting disabled children (like those with down's syndrome), I cannot really say those are the areas I want to used for cost containment even in rationed single payer systems. So far those choices are still being made by the woman carrying the child, but how long will it be before that changes? Are you aware in some European countries as many as 90+% of all down syndrome babies are now "selectively" aborted? A woman wanting to carry a down syndrome baby to term will not easily find support or care even now.
I would much prefer to leave personal choices, medical and otherwise, to individuals and not to _any_ governmental agency. But then I am a libertarian and have a lot more faith in people than government bureaucracies even while observing a few acting badly; they probably won't kill any more people than governors sending CV positive residents back to NHs.